This seems to comply with this license, but that doesn’t appear to comply with that license. Both this and that are linked from every gallery, thus.

Wow, that felt like a Victor Borge routine. I need to get out more.

§

Four comments here (latest comments)

  1. Aaargh! Unbalanced parentheses! Yes, I know I need to get out more as well.

    — PterK #

  2. Speaking of licensing, any thoughts on the GAGPLv3, GFDLv2 or SFDL?

    — Michael R. Bernstein #

  3. SDFL looks promising. If they can shake out the other bugs that debian-legal brought up, we might finally have a decent license for documentation. (Then again, if CC-BY-3.0 stays in Debian, maybe we’ll all just use that and say “screw you” to the FSF for being so stubborn about fixing GFDL 1.2.)

    — Mark #

  4. Well, you do tend to “play the keyboard” very well Mark. ;)

    If anyone has ever seen Mark in front of the computer, it’s a veritable ballet of keystrokes. Unless the application happens to have bad design with bad keyboard navigability (*cough*Prophet*cough*) and then it becomes a comedy of errors.

    So should we now call you the Victor Borge of scripting? :)

    — Adrian #

Respond privately

I am no longer accepting public comments on this post, but you can use this form to contact me privately. (Your message will not be published.)



§

firehose ‧ code ‧ planet

© 2001–8 Mark Pilgrim